2018年英語二真題閱讀-難度適中,整體的把握是關鍵
Text 3
The power and ambition of the giants of the digital economy is astonishing —Amazon has just announced the purchase of the upmarket grocery chain Whole Foods for $13.5bn, but two years ago Facebook paid even more than that to acquire the WhatsApp messaging service, which doesn’t have any physical product at all. What WhatsApp offered Facebook was an intricate and finely detailed web of its users’ friendships and social lives.
Facebook promised the European commission then that it would not link phone numbers to Facebook identities, but it broke the promise almost as soon as the deal went through. Even without knowing what was in the messages, the knowledge of who sent them and to whom was enormously revealing and still could be. What political journalist, what party whip, would not want to know the makeup of the WhatsApp groups in which Theresa May’s enemies are currently plotting? It may be that the value of Whole Foods to Amazon is not so much the 460 shops ft owns, but the records of which customers have purchased what.
Competition law appears to be the only way to address these imbalances of power. But it is clumsy. For one thing, it is very slow compared to the pace of change within the digital economy. By the time a problem has been addressed and remedied it may have vanished in the marketplace, to be replaced by new abuses of power. But there is a deeper conceptual problem, too. Competition law as presently interpreted deals with financial disadvantage to consumers and this is not obvious when the users of these services don’t pay for them. The users of their services are not their customers. That would be the people who buy advertising from them — and Facebook and Google, the two virtual giants, dominate digital advertising to the disadvantage of all other media and entertainment companies.
The product they’re selling is data, and we, the users, convert our lives to data for the benefit of the digital giants. Just as some ants farm the bugs called aphids for the honeydew they produce whe
31.According to Paragraph1,F(xiàn)acebook acquired WhatsApp for its
A.digital products
B.user information
C.physical assets
D.quality service
答案 [B]user information
解析:細節(jié)題。根據(jù)題干信息定位到第一段第二句。該句提到兩年前Facebook花了更多的錢獲得了WhatsApp的信息服務。接著提到WhatsApp提供給Facebook的是關于其用戶的朋友圈以及社會生活等具體精煉的信息。由此可知,B項為正確答案。
32.Linking phone numbers to Facebook identities may
A.worsen political disputes
B.mess up customer records
C.pose a risk to Facebook users
D.mislead the European commission
答案[C]pose a risk to Facebook users
解析:細節(jié)題。根據(jù)題干關鍵詞linking the phone number定位第二段第一句。該句提到Facebook向歐洲委員會承諾不會把用戶的電話號與Facebook的身份認證連系到一起,但是協(xié)議通過之后Facebook立馬失信。接下來提到“甚至都不清楚信息里面都有什么,也不知誰發(fā)的消息,發(fā)送的目的又是什么”。因此,可能會給用戶造成風險。因此C項符合文意。
33.According to the author,competition law
A.should serve the new market powers
B.may worsen the economic imbalances
C.should not provide just one legal solution
D.cannot keep pace with the changing market
答案 [D]cannot keep pace with the changing market
解析:細節(jié)題。根據(jù)題干關鍵詞competition law 定位到第三段第一句。該句指出“競爭法似乎成為解決這些不平等權(quán)力的唯一辦法,但是此法案太過笨拙”。下一句提到“一方面,相比于數(shù)據(jù)經(jīng)濟變化的速度,此法案發(fā)展是非常緩慢的”。由此可知,該法案跟不上當前市場變化的步伐。因此D項為正確答案。
34.Competition law as presently interpreted can hardly protect Facebook users
Because
A.they are no defined as customers
B.they are not financially reliable
C.these devices are generally digital
D.the services are paid for by advertisers
答案[D]the services are paid for by advertisers.
解析:根據(jù)題目中的because 可確定為因果細節(jié)題。題干中的信息出現(xiàn)在第三段后半部分,是題目中的原詞 competition law as presently interpreted,而原因在其后面的句子。下文寫到,the users of their services are not,讀到這里的not,一定要找而是誰。繼續(xù)讀下一句,That would be the people who buy advertising from them…,與選項對應,可得出[D]the services are paid for by advertisers。
35.The ants analogy is used to illustrate
A.a win-win business model between digital giants
B.a typical competition pattern among digital giants
C.the benefits provided for digital giants' customers
D.the relationship between digital giants and their users
答案[D]the relationship between digital giants and their users.
解析:根據(jù)題目中is used to illustrate可判斷為例證題,要找到the ants analogy論據(jù)所證明的論點;論點在論據(jù)之前,因此先找到論據(jù)the ants analogy,再找到論據(jù)前的論點句。所以本題定位到最后一段的第一句,The product …is data,and we…convert our lives to data…。此句中,data即digital giants,we 即 users。因此答案為[D]the relationship between digital giants and their users.
從考研英語二的文章來看,閱讀部分的文章大多摘自于美國專業(yè)刊物,如The Economist(經(jīng)濟學家)、Los Angeles Times(洛杉磯時報),如果平時沒有一定的閱讀積累,做起來還是有一定困難的。所以對于明年的考生來講,在平時多閱讀這樣的期刊雜志,積累一些經(jīng)濟、文化等方面的專業(yè)詞會對以后做閱讀題會有非常大的幫助。
(跨考英語教研室 金哲 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處)
2018考研初試已經(jīng)開始,跨考網(wǎng)將會為大家以最快的速度帶來各科考研真題,并會聘請跨考教研室老師在每場公共課考試過后及時為大家?guī)砜碱}解析,請大家及時關注跨考考研出品的2018年考研真題答案及解析專題,所有新鮮信息全部匯聚于此!傳送門:2018考研真題答案及解析
2018年考研真題及解析 | ||
公共課真題答案及解析 | 考研政治真題答案解析 | 考研英語真題及解析 |
考研管綜真題及解析 | 考研數(shù)學真題及解析 | |
專業(yè)課真題及答案 | 教育學真題及答案 | 心理學真題及答案 |
西醫(yī)綜合真題及答案 | 歷史學真題與答案 |
2022考研初復試已經(jīng)接近尾聲,考研學子全面進入2023屆備考,跨考為23考研的考生準備了10大課包全程準備、全年復習備考計劃、目標院校專業(yè)輔導、全真復試模擬練習和全程針對性指導;2023考研的小伙伴針也已經(jīng)開始擇校和復習了,跨考考研暢學5.0版本全新升級,無論你在校在家都可以更自如的完成你的考研復習,暑假集訓營帶來了院校專業(yè)初步選擇,明確方向;考研備考全年規(guī)劃,核心知識點入門;個性化制定備考方案,助你贏在起跑線,早出發(fā)一點離成功就更近一點!
點擊右側(cè)咨詢或直接前往了解更多
考研院校專業(yè)選擇和考研復習計劃 | |||
2023備考學習 | 2023線上線下隨時學習 | 34所自劃線院??佳袕驮嚪謹?shù)線匯總 | |
2022考研復試最全信息整理 | 全國各招生院??佳袕驮嚪謹?shù)線匯總 | ||
2023全日制封閉訓練 | 全國各招生院校考研調(diào)劑信息匯總 | ||
2023考研先知 | 考研考試科目有哪些? | 如何正確看待考研分數(shù)線? | |
不同院校相同專業(yè)如何選擇更適合自己的 | 從就業(yè)說考研如何擇專業(yè)? | ||
手把手教你如何選專業(yè)? | 高校研究生教育各學科門類排行榜 |
相關推薦
跨考考研課程
班型 | 定向班型 | 開班時間 | 高定班 | 標準班 | 課程介紹 | 咨詢 |
秋季集訓 | 沖刺班 | 9.10-12.20 | 168000 | 24800起 | 小班面授+專業(yè)課1對1+專業(yè)課定向輔導+協(xié)議加強課程(高定班)+專屬規(guī)劃答疑(高定班)+精細化答疑+復試資源(高定班)+復試課包(高定班)+復試指導(高定班)+復試班主任1v1服務(高定班)+復試面授密訓(高定班)+復試1v1(高定班) | |
2023集訓暢學 | 非定向(政英班/數(shù)政英班) | 每月20日 | 22800起(協(xié)議班) | 13800起 | 先行階在線課程+基礎階在線課程+強化階在線課程+真題階在線課程+沖刺階在線課程+專業(yè)課針對性一對一課程+班主任全程督學服務+全程規(guī)劃體系+全程測試體系+全程精細化答疑+擇校擇專業(yè)能力定位體系+全年關鍵環(huán)節(jié)指導體系+初試加強課+初試專屬服務+復試全科標準班服務 |