2019考研英語二真題閱讀理解text4原文及答案解析

　　Text 4

　　Arnold Schwarzenegger, Dia Mirza and Adrian Grenier have a message for you: It’s easy to beat plastic. They’re part of a bunch of celebrities staring in a new video for World Environment Day-encouraging you, the consumer, to swap out your single-use Plastic staples to combat the plastic crisis.

　　If only I’d realized that we can buy our way out of the problem except we can’t.

　　The key messages that have been put together for World Environment Day do include a call for governments to enact legislation to curb single-us plastics. But the overarching message is directed at individuals: Lead with your wallets.

　　The problem of perpetuating this individualistic narrative is that it's not going to get us very far and the plastics crisis we face is immense. Our oceans are blighted by the stuff. It's in our drinking water (including bottled water), and we could even be breathing it in.

　　I'm not dismissing individual actions like ordering straw-free drinks at bars, or opting for a reusable water bottle over a cup that's going in the trash as soon as you've used it. I can't imagine not at least trying to minimize my own plastics footprint, whether it's lugging home my newly-refilled gallon bottle of washing-up liquid every few months, or buying packaging-free food, clothing and toiletries where possible.

　　On their own, however, none of these things is enough.

　　Part of my worry about leaving it up to the individual is that we're all just guessing at what's going on out there-and that's if we haven't been scared off from doing anything to start with in the face of such a huge challenge. As consumers, we have little idea about how much plastic has been used and discarded along the supply chain, for example. It's also hard to compare, say, going to a bulk store that sells plastic-free products but requires you to drive some distance versus a more Iccal shop where you may end up taking home some packaged items.

　　There’s also a time and cost issue. Realistically, I'm not going to start making my own laundry detergents so I can avoid the plastic bottles they come in, and there can be extra costs associated with environmentally friendly products.

　　My biggest concern with leaving it up to the individual, however, is our limited sense of what needs to be achieved On their own, taking our own bags to the grocery store or quitting plastic straws, for example, will accomplish little and require very little of us. They could even be detrimental, satisfying a need to have "done our bit" without ever progressing onto bigger, bolder, more effective actions---a kind of "moral licensing" that allays our concerns and stops us doing more and asking more of those in charge.

　　While the conversation around our environment and our responsibility toward it remains centered on shopping bags and straws, we're ignoring the balance of power that implies that as "consumers" we must shop sustainably, rather than as "citizens" hold our governments and industries to account to push for real systemic change. Nowhere in World Environment Day 2018's key messages is there anything about voting for environmentally progressive politicians, for example. Why not?

　　It’s important to acknowledge that the environment isn’t everyone’s priority-or even most people’s. We shouldn’t expect it to be .In her latest book, Why Could People Do Bad Environmental Things, Wellesley College professor Elizabeth R. De Sombre argue that the best way to collectively change the behavior of large numbers of people is for the change to be structural.

　　This might mean implementing policy such as a plastic tax that adds a cost to environmentally problematic action, or banning single-use plastics altogether. India has just announced it will” eliminate all single-use plastic in the country by 2022.” There are also incentive-based ways of making better environmental choices easier, such as ensuring recycling is at least as easy as trash disposal.

　　De Sombre isn’t saying people should stop caring about the environment. It’s just that individual actions are too slow, she says, for that to be only, or even primary, approach to changing widespread behavior.

　　None of this is about writing off the individual. It’s just about putting things into perspective. We don’t have time to wait. We need progressive policies that shape collective action (and rein in polluting business), alongside engaged citizens pushing for change. That’s not something we can buy.

　　36. Some celebrities star in a new video to

　　A. demand new laws on the use of plastics

　　B. urge consumers to cut the use of plastics

　　C. invite public opinion on the plastics crisis

　　D. disclose the causes of the plastics crisis

　　37. The author is concerned that “moral licensing” may

　　A. mislead us into doing worthless things

　　B. prevent us from making further efforts

　　C. weaken our sense of accomplishment

　　D. suppress our desire for success

　　38. By pointing out our identity as “citizens,” the author indicates that

　　A. our focus should be shifted to community welfare

　　B. our relationship with local industries is improving

　　C. we have been actively exercising our civil rights

　　D. We should press our governments to lead the combat

　　39. De Sombre argues that the best way for a collective change should be

　　A. a win-win arrangement

　　B. a self-driven mechanism

　　C. a cost- effective approach

　　D. a top down process

　　40. The author concludes that individual efforts

　　A. can be too aggressive

　　B. are far from sufficient

　　C. can be too inconsistent

　　D. are far from rational

　　36. 答案【B】 urge consumers to cut the use of plastics

　　解析：根據(jù)題干的關鍵詞celebrities, star, in a new video,我們可以回文定位到第一段第二句話“They are part of a bunch of celebrities staring in a new video for ...”出現(xiàn)此事的目的是“encouraging you, the consumer, to swap out your single-use plastic staples to combat the plastic crisis.”由此可見第二個選項和原文屬于統(tǒng)一置換，得答案。

　　37. 答案【B】prevent us from making further efforts

　　解析：此題干是作者concerned，還有一個關鍵詞“moral licensing”回文定位到第九段，段首my biggest concern定位;“without ever progressive onto bigger, bolder, more effective actions”即moral licensing。Without的內容就是作者最擔憂的內容，此題得解。

　　38. 答案【D】we should press our governments to lead the combat

　　解析：通過題干關鍵詞“citizens”定位到第十段一句話。詞句中是一個比較結構rather than citizens hold our governments and industries to account to push to real systemic change,這句話的主語是我們忽視的內容是這樣子的，那由rather than進行轉折，作者的觀點就是我們不應忽略的內容，所以，和第三個答案異曲同工，都是希望政府起到主導作用。

　　39. 答案【D】 a top-down process

　　解析：通過題干人名，最好的方式，collective change定位到倒數(shù)第四段最后一句;最好的方式是直接定位到for the change to be structural.由此可見是結構性的變革，再加上下面兩段的例證，得此題答案徹底性的變革。

　　40. 答案【B】 are far from sufficient

　　解析：根據(jù)題干定位到最后一段。第一句說并不是個體不重要，第二句說只是我們要換個角度，第三句我們不能等，第四句我們需要progressive policies...等等，都說明個體重要但是這個是力量有限的，需要其他方面的跟進。所以此題選擇了第二個選項。

　　(本文為跨考教育教研室老師解析，轉載請注明出處。)