2014考研英語(yǔ):英文報(bào)刊文章閱讀(六)_跨考網(wǎng)

最后更新時(shí)間:2013-05-30 00:32:32
輔導(dǎo)課程:暑期集訓(xùn) 在線咨詢(xún)
復(fù)習(xí)緊張,焦頭爛額?逆風(fēng)輕襲,來(lái)跨考秋季集訓(xùn)營(yíng),幫你尋方法,定方案! 了解一下>>

  A judge flunks Cleveland's use of vouchers for parochial schools. But will that stall the movement?

  Walter Milancuk's public-school horror story began early, when his son Derrick spent kindergarten in an overcrowded roomful of students who regularly fought in class and cursed the teacher. Milancuk wanted to transfer Derrick, but his salary as a forklift driver couldn't cover private-school tuition. Yet Milancuk found a way out, thanks to Cleveland's pioneering school-voucher program, which granted him close to $1,500 in state funds to help enroll Derrick at St. Stanislaus, a nearby Catholic school. Now Derrick wears a crisp uniform. His reading has improved. And the weekly Mass and Bible study have moved Derrick to say his daily prayers without prompting. Says his dad, "The school is really building his faith."

  That may prove to be more of a curse than a blessing. Last week a federal judge struck down Cleveland's voucher program, ruling that it violates the constitutional separation of church and state. Citing Jefferson and Madison, Judge Solomon Oliver Jr. wrote that because four-fifths of the private schools participating in the voucher program are religious, the program robs parents of "genuine choice" between sectarian and secular schools, thus "advancing religion through government-supported religious indoctrination." The decision is the fourth in recent months to bar the use of vouchers in parochial schools, and voucher opponents--mainly teachers' unions and liberal interest groups--see it as a major victory.

  Voucher backers--an unusual coalition of inner-city parents and conservative groups--retort that the judge misread both the Cleveland program and the First Amendment. They point out that Cleveland parents who don't like parochial schools can send their kids to the city's regular public schools, or to public charter schools and magnet schools. Clint Bolick, a lawyer for the Institute for Justice, which defended the voucher program, says, "No one can compel a child into the program or into a religious school."

  Despite its recent setbacks, the voucher movement is gaining ground in state legislatures and some state courts. This fall Florida started the first statewide voucher program. And the Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld the use of vouchers in parochial schools in Milwaukee. In the presidential campaign, G.O.P. candidates John McCain and George W. Bush are trumpeting voucher proposals. While Vice President Al Gore launched an ad that calls vouchers a "big mistake," his Democratic opponent Bill Bradley supports them, at least as "experiments."

  Though the U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear several school-choice cases, legal experts suspect the more clear-cut Cleveland case might prod it into action. In the meantime, Judge Oliver is allowing Derrick Milancuk and nearly 4,000 other students in the Cleveland voucher program to remain in their schools while his ruling is on appeal.

  By Jodie Morse Time; 12/31/99, Vol. 154 Issue 27, p220, 2/3p, 1c

  注(1):本文選自By Jodie Morse Time; 12/31/99, Vol. 154 Issue 27, p220, 2/3p, 1c

  注(2):本文習(xí)題命題模仿對(duì)象2004年真題text 2

  1.What does the author intend to illustrate with Derrick’s change of performance in different schools?

  [A] the role voucher program plays in helping children get better education

  [B] the change a parochial school can bring to a child

  [C] the poor education quality of public schools

  [D] the importance of enrolling kids of poor performance in private schools

  2.What can we infer from the second paragraph?

  [A] Parents do not have a choice when they send their children to religious schools.

  [B]. The judge’s ruling is helpful in building better public schools.

  [C] Teaching religious stuff in schools is a violation of the Constitution.

  [D] Teachers of public schools do not welcome the idea of voucher program.

  3.What does “advance religion through government-supported religious indoctrination” (Line 5, Paragraph 2) mean?

  [A] promote religious ideas in public schools with government support

  [B] collect government resources to support religious activities

  [C] help religious schools use public fund to spread religious ideas

  [D] allow religion to interfere with government work

  4. The 4th paragraph suggests that _________________.

  [A] Judge Oliver’s ruling has caused political debate between the Republicans and the Democrats.

  [B] George W. Bush is in favor of voucher program.

  [C] Voucher program does more good than harm.

  [D] Democrats have a low opinion of voucher program.

  5. Which of the following is true according to the text?

  [A] The author thinks that voucher program is more of a curse than a blessing.

  [B] The U.S Supreme Court will not support voucher program.

  [C] Parents will have no choice but send their children to religious schools if they join in the voucher program.

  [D] Voucher program is still a controversial issue in legal and political areas.

  答案:A D C B D

  2022考研初復(fù)試已經(jīng)接近尾聲,考研學(xué)子全面進(jìn)入2023屆備考,跨考為23考研的考生準(zhǔn)備了10大課包全程準(zhǔn)備、全年復(fù)習(xí)備考計(jì)劃、目標(biāo)院校專(zhuān)業(yè)輔導(dǎo)、全真復(fù)試模擬練習(xí)和全程針對(duì)性指導(dǎo);2023考研的小伙伴針也已經(jīng)開(kāi)始擇校和復(fù)習(xí)了,跨考考研暢學(xué)5.0版本全新升級(jí),無(wú)論你在校在家都可以更自如的完成你的考研復(fù)習(xí),暑假集訓(xùn)營(yíng)帶來(lái)了院校專(zhuān)業(yè)初步選擇,明確方向;考研備考全年規(guī)劃,核心知識(shí)點(diǎn)入門(mén);個(gè)性化制定備考方案,助你贏在起跑線,早出發(fā)一點(diǎn)離成功就更近一點(diǎn)!

點(diǎn)擊右側(cè)咨詢(xún)或直接前往了解更多

考研院校專(zhuān)業(yè)選擇和考研復(fù)習(xí)計(jì)劃
2023備考學(xué)習(xí) 2023線上線下隨時(shí)學(xué)習(xí) 34所自劃線院校考研復(fù)試分?jǐn)?shù)線匯總
2022考研復(fù)試最全信息整理 全國(guó)各招生院??佳袕?fù)試分?jǐn)?shù)線匯總
2023全日制封閉訓(xùn)練 全國(guó)各招生院校考研調(diào)劑信息匯總
2023考研先知 考研考試科目有哪些? 如何正確看待考研分?jǐn)?shù)線?
不同院校相同專(zhuān)業(yè)如何選擇更適合自己的 從就業(yè)說(shuō)考研如何擇專(zhuān)業(yè)?
手把手教你如何選專(zhuān)業(yè)? 高校研究生教育各學(xué)科門(mén)類(lèi)排行榜

跨考考研課程

班型 定向班型 開(kāi)班時(shí)間 高定班 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)班 課程介紹 咨詢(xún)
秋季集訓(xùn) 沖刺班 9.10-12.20 168000 24800起 小班面授+專(zhuān)業(yè)課1對(duì)1+專(zhuān)業(yè)課定向輔導(dǎo)+協(xié)議加強(qiáng)課程(高定班)+專(zhuān)屬規(guī)劃答疑(高定班)+精細(xì)化答疑+復(fù)試資源(高定班)+復(fù)試課包(高定班)+復(fù)試指導(dǎo)(高定班)+復(fù)試班主任1v1服務(wù)(高定班)+復(fù)試面授密訓(xùn)(高定班)+復(fù)試1v1(高定班)
2023集訓(xùn)暢學(xué) 非定向(政英班/數(shù)政英班) 每月20日 22800起(協(xié)議班) 13800起 先行階在線課程+基礎(chǔ)階在線課程+強(qiáng)化階在線課程+真題階在線課程+沖刺階在線課程+專(zhuān)業(yè)課針對(duì)性一對(duì)一課程+班主任全程督學(xué)服務(wù)+全程規(guī)劃體系+全程測(cè)試體系+全程精細(xì)化答疑+擇校擇專(zhuān)業(yè)能力定位體系+全年關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)指導(dǎo)體系+初試加強(qiáng)課+初試專(zhuān)屬服務(wù)+復(fù)試全科標(biāo)準(zhǔn)班服務(wù)

①凡本網(wǎng)注明“稿件來(lái)源:跨考網(wǎng)”的所有文字、圖片和音視頻稿件,版權(quán)均屬北京尚學(xué)碩博教育咨詢(xún)有限公司(含本網(wǎng)和跨考網(wǎng))所有,任何媒體、網(wǎng)站或個(gè)人未經(jīng)本網(wǎng)協(xié)議授權(quán)不得轉(zhuǎn)載、鏈接、轉(zhuǎn)帖或以其他任何方式復(fù)制、發(fā)表。已經(jīng)本網(wǎng)協(xié)議授權(quán)的媒體、網(wǎng)站,在下載使用時(shí)必須注明“稿件來(lái)源,跨考網(wǎng)”,違者本網(wǎng)將依法追究法律責(zé)任。

②本網(wǎng)未注明“稿件來(lái)源:跨考網(wǎng)”的文/圖等稿件均為轉(zhuǎn)載稿,本網(wǎng)轉(zhuǎn)載僅基于傳遞更多信息之目的,并不意味著再通轉(zhuǎn)載稿的觀點(diǎn)或證實(shí)其內(nèi)容的真實(shí)性。如其他媒體、網(wǎng)站或個(gè)人從本網(wǎng)下載使用,必須保留本網(wǎng)注明的“稿件來(lái)源”,并自負(fù)版權(quán)等法律責(zé)任。如擅自篡改為“稿件來(lái)源:跨考網(wǎng)”,本網(wǎng)將依法追究法律責(zé)任。

③如本網(wǎng)轉(zhuǎn)載稿涉及版權(quán)等問(wèn)題,請(qǐng)作者見(jiàn)稿后在兩周內(nèi)速來(lái)電與跨考網(wǎng)聯(lián)系,電話:400-883-2220